Skip to main content

行动党布阵策略错误? 颜金勇拉高平均年龄, 保守的象征, 改变的绊脚石。

 行动党布阵策略错误?

颜金勇拉高平均年龄,

保守的象征,

改变的绊脚石。


过气、过期的4G颜金勇, 真的能够绊倒工人党吗?

3G张志贤,4G王瑞杰,已经人走茶凉。

为什么3G颜金勇要来榜鹅,难道这里的海鲜特别香吗?从接班人的安排,颜金勇是不可能做总理。他的前路比2020年的王瑞杰相差太远了。王是以未来总理的身份来豪赌。颜金勇没有什么好输,只有剩余价值。


颜金勇的作用,就像死鱼,希望能够为行动党翻身。这是否尊重选民吗?一个几乎退休,过气,过期的人物,在竞选期间,他只是看管副总理,说不一定大选过后,就没有了,胜选变资政,落选就退休。


榜鹅是一个新选区,选民希望看到年轻、改变的气氛。颜金勇的出现,把原本有一点亮眼、朝气的行动党团队,变成老态龙钟,暮气沉沉。工人党的出现,新空气、新气象,就是让人觉得改变的到来。


东海岸是一个旧选区,选民有怀旧感,而王瑞杰又是总理接班人,因此,可以给行动党一个机会。榜鹅就很不一样。原本行动党建立的年轻形象,一下子就被颜金勇破坏了。为什么行动党不敢派年轻部长来拉高人气?


颜金勇在为行动党做最后的拼搏,利用他的剩余价值为党做出贡献。可以算是勇气可嘉。不适合的人放错位置,很可能造成不可弥补的损失。选民知道发生了什么事情,拿看管副总理的高位,真的能够顺利过关吗?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...