Skip to main content

1元市场和18元意大利面 场面失控和优雅用餐的两级世界。 面对关税大战，PAP真的了解民间疾苦吗？

 1元市场和18元意大利面

场面失控和优雅用餐的两级世界。

面对关税大战，PAP真的了解民间疾苦吗？


PAP有多脱节？它低估了1元购物的魅力，为什么会有这么多人挤爆市场，为的就是要省一点钱，然后，把省下的钱，用在他处。当然，也可以说成，他们喜欢热闹，就如老人收集纸皮，也是一种运动呀！


PAP的部长，议员却坐在西餐厅，优雅的享用意大利面，看着挤爆的市场，怀疑的问同伴，事情有这么严重吗？政府不是已经发购物券，现金，折扣，津贴，难道这么做还不够吗？还要做些什么？不明白？


关税大战才刚开始，匆匆忙忙就设立委员会，应对巨变。这是表面功夫，还是有心协助人民？甚至，鼓动无助感，期望PAP成为救世主。捞取政治资本。从1985开始的经济委员会，到现在已经有好多个委员会，为何依然无法解决贫富悬殊，反而搞到现在出现挤爆1元市场的困境！


根据吴作栋的瑞士生活标准，大多数新加坡人应该吃得起18元意大利面，低一点5元云吞面也消费得起。偏偏现在，关税大战还没有明朗，人民已经为1元米、货品而折腰。或许，PAP认为有人贪小便宜，要让PAP难堪。


李显龙说，要看候选人背后的党，那个党代表什么精神？1元市场和18元意大利面，让人看清PAP的候选人和这个党的价值，你还继续相信下去吗? 给予强而有力的委托吗？

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
277 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
51 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more