Skip to main content

出现4角战 是不是这个集选区管得太烂? 人人都觉得有机可乘? 当然在野互斗对行动党是有利。

 出现4角战

是不是这个集选区管得太烂?

人人都觉得有机可乘?

当然在野互斗对行动党是有利。


有没有做事,选民很清楚。过去的表现,有记录,逃也逃不掉。三个在野党都看上淡滨尼,大家的眼光都一样吗?还是,只在乎参与,试一试水温?无论如何,这个选区一定有一点问题,不然为何要冒着失去安柜金的风险,来此一游?


4角战当然比2角战来得激烈,选情升温,尤其是进入比较危急,没有牌可以打的时候,就往往可以借道外部势力介入,影响、左右选举来暗示某些

人获得外来支持,增加胜选机会。这一来,所有政党都必须出来坚持反对外来干涉、干扰。大家都回到相同的起跑点上。


仔细想一想,淡滨尼之战,只能说介于行动党和工人党。 这个选区一直以来,都没有出现强烈的竞争。过去依靠大风得到超过40%支持,不表示这个历史可以长青下去。政治的变比变脸还来得快。


行动党一开头就先确定淡滨尼团队名单,也无意改变。不像榜鹅,马林百列,举棋不定。这说明,行动党对淡滨尼有一定信心。但是,选情是一个变数,风向一转,就如,记者一直追问,工人党是否因为马来族群,才来淡滨尼竞选?这问题似乎更像事后孔明,或借刀杀人,想要落实某些论点。现在,似乎看到一些蛛丝马迹。


选情还在变化中,这个课题还在发展中。除了提名日的策略、战术上的点兵选将外,接下来是议题的发挥,布阵上不足,就要通过课题炒作来完成既定目标。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...