Skip to main content

From master of everything to master of nothing, what do you think about the PAP?


The PAP has changed from knowing everything to knowing nothing.  They have become humble and so instead of providing a perfect answer, they now ask you ‘what do you think’ and seek you answers rather than giving you answers.

In his speech to the Economic Society of Singapore, PM Lee outlined the challenges of Singapore and the possible directions of Singapore economy and political developments.  There is no right or wrong answer.  What do you think, fast growth or slow growth?  

Perhaps, from PM Lee’s speech we can pinpoint some very interesting ‘what do you think’ answers:

(Below questions are taken from PM Lee’s speech, you can find the full speech in sg.yahoo.com)     

PM Lee: I understand Singaporeans' frustrations and am committed to resolving them.
What do you think? Is it a fair statement? Is he doing enough to solve them?

PM Lee: even thought our per capita GDP is high, our wages are generally lower than in developed countries.
What do you think? Prof. Lim has already provided the answer. Earnings of low wage workers have no real increase for more than 10 years. 

PM Lee: So inequality will grow worldwide, and angst and social pressures will go up.
What do you think? Don’t blame the government. We should accept inequality as we are part of the world. 

PM Lee: Where do we want Singapore to be in 20 years' time?
What do you think? Who is to decide the fate of Singaporeans? The PAP or Singaporeans and see the next question.

PM Lee: A new generation is growing up, brimming with fresh ideas on how to change Singapore for the better.
What do you think? The fresh ideas to change Singapore are from the youths or the new generation of the PAP leaders.

PM Lee: For Singapore, slow growth will mean that new investments will be fewer, good jobs will be scarcer, and unemployment will be higher.
What do you think? Be prepared to face a Singapore of fewer investments, less good jobs and higher unemployment.

PM Lee: If we are content to just be above average in the league of cities, we will fail. That is the greatest danger if we tell ourselves to slow down, enjoy life today and not worry about tomorrow.
What do you think? On the one hand our elites are enjoying life and not worry about tomorrow. On the other hand, average Singaporeans are already struggling for housing, transport, employment and income. What can you do if you are an average Singaporean?   

PM Lee: Our reserves are a valuable buffer against external shocks, and give us the confidence to transform our economy. Not many other countries, or cities, in the world can claim the same.
What do you think? We really do not know how much how big our reserves are.  Some say it may take more than 50 man-years to calculate.  Really, not many other countries can claim the same.

PM Lee: In the past five years, transfers added one-fifth to low-income household earnings. Over a lifetime, a low-income household will receive more than S$500,000 from the government.
What do you think? If you are not a millionaire you must be a half millionaire. I feel so happy looking at the government transfers.  

PM Lee: Therefore to assess the well-being of low-income Singaporeans, we cannot look at just nominal wages.
What do you think?  Shall we look at the hawker’s centres, food courts and restaurants or the cars, houses or holidays?   

PM Lee: At some point - not in this term of government, but surely within the next 20 years - the Government of the day will need new sources of revenue, which means raising taxes.
What do you think? Be prepared to pay more taxes in future.

PM Lee: We will always give Singaporeans the means and the incentives to help themselves, for personal effort and achievement are essential to our sense of dignity and self-worth, and the means to achieve our vision of becoming a leading global city.
What do you think? The means and the incentives are available and always there but you need to look for them.  It may hide somewhere provided you know the way.

PM Lee: Only when citizens accept the political system as legitimate, and economic order as fair, will they give the government of the support and the mandate to run Singapore in their best interests. And only with this mandate can the government do the best for Singapore and all of us.
What do you think? Legitimate, fair, and mandate to the PAP and the government will do the best for Singapore. We have been doing this for the past 50 years and what do we get?

PM Lee: As we venture into the next phase of our development, Singaporeans have to understand what is achievable, what the options are, and what trade-offs we have to make. Only then we can collectively choose an optimal path forward.
What do you think? Is it a collective optimal path for Singaporeans or the PAP? 

PM Lee: The way ahead for Singapore is challenging, but we have reason to be confident.
What do you think? The way ahead for the PAP is challenging but we have confident on the people to vote wisely.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...