Skip to main content

In The Sea Of Weak Currencies, Can Singapore Be An Exception?


The world major economies are competing to weaken their currencies.  The USA, Europe and Japan, all of them, do not like to have strong currencies of their own.  The weak world economy and fundamentals have forced major economies strategically wanting to have a weak currency to boost exports, create jobs and stimulate the economy.

Even emerging economies, like China, also do not want to have strong currency despite of having huge foreign reserve.

So, how far, can Singapore dollar continue to maintain its strong position? Can the sole purpose of fighting inflation but at the expense of economy continue?  The Monetary Authority of Singapore in a statement in August wanted a moderate appreciation of Sing dollar.  

Competition of Weak Currencies

Every major economy wants to create more jobs, wants to stimulate economy and wants to have more exports.  There is no more national pride to maintain a strong currency.  For the USA, the only way to solve their economic and debt problems is to continue printing the dollar.  How can an over supply currency be a strong money?

The USA has also one of the highest per capita poverty in the world. A recently BBC report said:    
The number of Americans living in poverty rose to 46.2 million last year, nearly one in six people, according to the US Census Bureau's annual report.
The 2010 data shows the poverty rate at 15.1%, from 14.3% in 2009. The number of Americans without health insurance also rose slightly to 49.9 million. (BBC)

In the Euro zone, debts problems (and unemployment) continue in the PIGS countries.  Is it really good for Euro zone to solve the debts problems immediately and make the Euro much stronger than the dollar?   The PIGS uncertainty has an unexpected (or intended) result: a weak euro.

However, when your neighbours are having troubles and problems, are you really better off even you are rich and having a strong economy?   

Safe-heaven can be a problem too

Look at Switzerland. The safe-heaven Swiss franc is too strong to be comfortable to their economy.  Yes, the Swiss inflation is low (nearly zero) but the economy is bad due to the strong Swiss franc.  And the major contributing factor is a weak euro resulted from the PIGS debt problems.  

In another BBC report, it said: Across Switzerland's manufacturing and tourism industries, the story is the same. From the big pharmaceutical companies to the family-run hotels in the alps, every area of Swiss economic activity is being affected.

As the crisis in the eurozone continues, the Swiss franc is being seen as a safe haven by international investors.
As a consequence, the Swiss currency is rising to undreamt of levels.

Anything with a price tag in Swiss francs is being priced out of the market, and Swiss industry leaders are voicing extreme concern.”

To Singapore, we are too proud to have a strong Sing dollar.  But when everyone (at least the major economies) is against it, why are we so special? Even with strong Sing dollar, our inflation is high. Does it mean our inflation will jump if we relax the strong currency policy?

Unlimited printing of Swiss Franc and the dollar

Early this month, the Swiss National Bank (SNB) has set a minimum exchange rate of 1.20 francs to the euro, saying the current value of the franc is a threat to the economy.

The SNB said it would enforce the minimum rate by buying foreign currency in unlimited quantities.

It is the same saying like the USA, if there is a need to borrow more money by issuing bonds, the US Treasury will print dollar as there is a need.  Now the Swiss central bank is doing the same, if there is a need of Swiss franc in the market, they will print Swiss franc to meet the market demand just not to over value the Swiss franc.

Will the competition to weaken currencies solve the basic problems?

No one knows.

The saying in Singapore politics is we are now entering the new normal. The world economy is already entering a new normal.  In fact as early as the sub-prime crisis, the new normal in business and economy has already begun.  How long will the new normal matured and stabilised? We don’t know.

The new normal will create new opportunities and risks.  Are our MAS, Temasek and GIC ready for the challenges in the new normal era? Can the old wisdom of Tony Tan as he claimed during PE2011 help the government with a better understanding of the world financial market?

Judging from the appointment of Wong Kan Seng as special advisor to the PM and chairman of Singbridge, one will wonder whether there is a change for the new normal. Perhaps, the PAP still prefers to use the old bottle to solve the new normal problems.

Will they say or disclose something when the New Parliament opens on 10 Oct 2011?  It is such a co-incidence that Oct 10 is the beginning of the new China 100 years ago in 1911 with the founding of Republic of China and the end of Qing Dynasty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...