Skip to main content

Foreign Talents As Singapore Chinese Elites



Soon, we will have to import foreign talents as our Chinese elites as we are unable to train and educate the critical mass of such people.  This is not the worry of the Chinese community and educated persons in Singapore, but also the government.   

It is quite obvious that the Ministry of Education will not be able to produce enough Chinese elites for the future need of Singapore or the kind of bilingual elites that the PAP is looking for.  These so-called Chinese elites are in short supply and no matter how we try to promote the use of Chinese language, we will never be able to produce the critical base of local Chinese elites in Singapore.  

Even though Minister for Education Heng Swee Keat said all political appointment holders at MOE are looking after the bilingualism but it is very clear that we have lost the cultural DNA to produce elites in Chinese as well as in India and Malay. 

The Minister said “All of us (political appointment holders) will continue to pay due attention to the teaching and learning of the English Language and our Mother Tongue Languages” in his first major policy address to school heads at his ministry's annual workplan seminar last week.

Few will expect current education policy and language environment will turn out enough numbers of local Chinese elites in Singapore, a worry since the closing down of Chinese schools in the 1980s.

Everything can be imported? Even Chinese elites                                                        

As usual, the government way of solving problems is if there is no enough, we import them, likes the changes in immigration policy to make up the low birth rate, and the adjustments in the foreign workers policy to meet the demand of manpower need. Soon, we will have to do it at a large scale by importing Chinese elites.

In fact, we have already been doing so in the past 10 or 20 years. For many years, we have been importing Malaysian Chinese, especially those graduated from Chinese independent schools.  These schools are like our old Chinese schools in Singapore and students there study Chinese as their first language.

The term “Chinese elites” may not be appropriate as to make up the critical mass, we also need other non Chinese elites or less intelligent people but with Chinese proficiency to come out with the required size of numbers for our economic needs.

Hence, like the foreign talents and workers policy, we will need to import skilled and unskilled Chinese elites and people from China, Taiwan, Hong Kong as well as the traditional source, Malaysia. 

Will there be a future without a root?

The theme of this year’s Work Plan Seminar is “Our Children. Our Purpose. Our Future.”  If MOE and the government really concern about the future of our children and the purpose of education, then they should re-look and re-focus the basis, especially MOE wants to emphasize on value and character building and development of our children.

Singapore is an Asian society.  Unless we think we can totally immerse into a western society with their value system and personal behaviours, otherwise, we better try to keep our root as what former PM Lee Kuan Yew have suggested during the launch of his Chinese version of “Hard Truths”.  The best way to do this is to have a better understanding of Mother Tongue.

Japan has wanted to be a western country since she adopted western system of government, science and technology and administration.  However, until today, it is still not a western country culturally. Perhaps, Singapore can out do Japan as we are willing to give up our language and culture.     

The PAP always wants to stress that Singapore is an Asian society so that we do not have to follow the democratic practices in the West. They use this as an excuse to be different from the West. But don’t they realise that we are also different in culture and value system?  Without the support of the Asian root, culture and value, Singapore will as normal as a white banana.   

Why the worry?

This is because the importance of MT is declining.  There are too many incidents that Chinese signboards are missing at our pubic transport system, even the airports. If you read Zaobao, these are the frequent complaints in the forum pages. Not to mention, our children proudly claim that ‘I hate Chinese or MT.’

All four presidential candidates did not communicate well in Chinese is another setback for Chinese learning in Singapore.  In future, it will be very hard for Singapore to have a President who can speak and understand Chinese like Ong Teng Cheong.

In fact, the local Chinese speaking community is declining too. Readers of Chinese newspapers have a sizable numbers of non local Chinese. Even though the circulation of Chinese press does not decline, this does not mean that there is more local reading the Chinese papers.  It is mainly because the loss of readership is made up by Chinese readers from China.   

Few years ago, the newly appointed President of Nanyang Technological University has an ambition plan to drop the word “Technological” from NTU. It wants to date back the university to 1955, the founding year of the old Nanyang University.  You can date your history back to whatever date you like. However, you can’t bring back the value and the cultural DNA. Anyway, the change of name is not successful.

For the case of Chinese elites in Singapore, it will also like the fate of the old Nanyang University, a history to remember.  Can you import Nantah spirit? Can you import Chinese elites?  Can value and culture be so cheaply imported?  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...