Skip to main content

大选迷思,PAP的困境4: 李光耀故居,如何善后?圆满善终?

大选迷思,PAP的困境4:

李光耀故居,如何善后?圆满善终?


没有团圆饭的李家。李光耀做梦也想不到,子女们竟然无法坐在一起吃团圆饭。他可能做梦也想不到,他的故去,竟然演变成新加坡的路线之争。一方坚持李光耀精神、立国信念;另一方主张修正、修订,考虑国家,甚至政治利益。


黄循财现在是总理,也是人民行动党秘书长,他会如何处理烫手的故居,他会选择哪一条路线,还是继续摇摆,大选过后,才来决定。选民是否期待他做出决定?还是,无所谓,而在地下的李光耀,会不会认为这是国之根本,必须现身,为SG, PAP解套。善后还是善终?不知道。


新加坡的成长路,就是不断的修正改良,但是,有些传统,却不断、不停的坚持,如:立国精神、反贪、反毒、效率等,只是修正改良的路,似乎越来越让人质疑,这条路,有没有走歪了?例如:居者有其屋,公积金用途,生育率,外来人口,拥车证,消费税,还有故居的善后工作。。。


PAP自认,它所有的改变,改良都是为新加坡人好,从新加坡人的立场出发,考虑的是国际和国内的各种因素,因此,他已经做到善后,当然,也会得到善终?质疑归质疑,选民最后还是相信白衣人。真的吗?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...