Skip to main content

PAP is so stupid: It fails to catch a mouse, now how to catch a tiger.


Despite having 90% seats in Singapore 12th parliament (and with 5 retired generals from the three forces), the PAP can only have themselves to blame for not able to catch a mouse. And now they let the mouse runs out of the house and turn themselves into tigers and tigress.

So stupid! With state machinery and full control of the parliament, the PAP can’t even catch a little mouse. What the PAP can do and capable of doing is to complicate the case and in some ways make-up a story.

Mo Xu You and the death of a national hero

{Although Yue Fei and other war hawks had won brilliant victories and recovered the most part of the territory, it was the capitulationists like Qin Hui who wielded real power at court. They even resorted to false accusations to eliminate the war party and finally had Yue Fei sent to prison and executed. At the news, General Han Shizhong asked Qin Hui, 'What crime in the world did Yue Fei commit?' To this, Qin Hui replied evasively, 'Mo Xu You' which meant 'something fairly likely.' Later the phrase 'mo xu you' entered Chinese to mean a trumped-up charge or a fabricated charge. Yue Fei was only 39 at the time he was executed.}
http://chineseculture.about.com/library/weekly/aa041301a.htm

Now they cry high and low and complain the tigers are so strong outside and they are so afraid to send their generals and police chief to catch them. Once outside, Mo Xu You cannot work effectively as the masses are watching, the international community is watching.

The whole development of AHPETC and government grants is controlled and managed by the PAP government with the support of the media. But where is the mouse?

If such a powerful government is not able to find WP faults inside the parliament, what can they find outside the house. The irony is they will not be able to fight the tigers outside parliament.

So, they attack oppositions and question their integrity. From AHPETC to Dr. Chee’s old story, and once they find some untrue fishy story of Dr. Daniel Goh, they quickly publish it without checking.   

Luck is not with the PAP    

First, the PAP does not have the support of the masses. Your look at the first day of election rally, you will have the answer.

Second, PM Lee entered the wrong entry at Raffles Institution Nomination Centre. September 1 in Chinese calendar was a good foundation day and yet he failed to lay the foundation stone.  



Third, his personal posters are all over Singapore during the 7th month.  In this period, children and adults must stay at home for safety reason, especially after midnight. Perhaps, he wants to empower himself from the other world so that he can catch the tigers in day time.

Fourth, the PAP positions itself as a regional party discussing local issues.  Furthermore, the PAP’s image is a past history not the future. When everyone want to talk about future and Singapore Core, the PAP just steps aside. They enjoy talking Mo Xu You.

The whole PAP election strategy is under ‘jeer’. And yet the PAP fails to understand why.

Comments

  1. The answer is very simple why they fail to understand why they got jeered.

    Under normal times, everyone at PAP is trying to make as much money as possible for themselves , not very much different from those UMNO cronies up north. They look forward to being rewarded for director positions like that CASE election candidate who possibly holds more director positions than he can chew, some more he is so greedy he wants to stand for this coming election.

    Only when elections come, they start holding media interviews while seated in the middle of the crowds at hawker centres. Why act so hypocrite ? People can see how fake these PAP candidates including ministers can be. When has the hawker centre become the PAP centre of media attraction before ? The only thing we can still remember was the infamous question posed by a PAP minister regarding those unfortunate ones was "where do they expect to have their meals hawker centre, foodcourt or restaurant?

    And after the election, how many PAP ministers or MPs is going to ever step into a hawker centre or for that matter a wet market again?

    Why so fake PAP? I thought they are supposed to have very pure hearts. Pure hearts, my foot!!!.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They were too busy catching rats in Bukit Batok..... Spending so much money and so many months, and they still can't get rid of the rats. How to catch mice?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...