Skip to main content

从《美国问,中国答》到风水轮流转的《中国问,美国答》:“时代三问”映射AI的中国式提问与世界选项

 

从《美国问,中国答》到风水轮流转的《中国问,美国答》:“时代三问”映射AI的中国式提问与世界选项



在历史的宏大叙事中,真正具有分水岭意义的时刻,往往发生得悄无声息。

从“跟跑”到“出题”的历史跨越

从吴庆瑞博士在历史后台默默为中国经济调试发动机,到今天中方在台前向美国总统提出“时代三问”,风水轮流转的背后,是力量天平的重新对齐。

世界如今面临的选项很清晰:是跟随美国的旧思维,继续在AI领域搞科技冷战、筑墙设壁,从而承受通胀飙升与地缘冲突的代价?还是接受中国提出的G2现实,在保障各自安全底线的同时,通过务实的“双赢”机制(如投资委员会、新能源合作),让技术红利普惠全球的中产与底层阶级?

纸上得来终觉浅,绝知此事要躬行。” 北京峰会的纸面声明无法掩盖底层地缘波涛的汹涌。美国如果交不出真正有远见的答卷,那么这艘由中美双雄共同执舵的全球化巨轮,终将在AI科技革命与地缘政治的暴风雨中,迎来更猛烈的颠簸。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...