Skip to main content

大选成绩:老的满意,少的不满·。 习惯性投票的过去,现在,未来?

 大选的正能量?现象?趋势?(5/5)

大选成绩:老的满意,少的不满·。

习惯性投票的过去,现在,未来?


调查显示,56%的人满意大选结果。比行动党的65.57%得票率低。满意者来自老一辈,而不满意者属于年轻一代。这是不是与习惯性投票有关?老一辈只想找闪电,找不到可能乱画成了废票。年轻一代,目标清晰,会分辨,和老一辈的养成习惯投票不同。


支持行动党的人为何,不对大选成绩给予更加高的满意度?让满意度拉高到60%以上?看来,支持者只在乎寻找闪电,而不在乎满意度。习惯性投票的心态,对于行动党短期有利,长期不乐观。随着习惯投票给行动党的选民老去,而年轻一代逐渐成为主流选民,行动党的基本票源,会出现根本性变化。


与其说,年轻人不满大选成绩,不如说行动党对于基本的生活费,以及相关的组屋价格,医药,就业机会,消费税等,提供不了满意的解决方案。这些课题,不容易解决,一时之间也解决不了,甚至,到了下一次大选,问题依然存在。几十年累积下来的贫富不均问题,不是一个五年就能解决的。


从老一辈习惯性寻找闪电,到年轻一代习惯性的要有选择,新加坡的选举氛围、气候,已经进入了另一个阶段。外面的世界加速变化,内部的政治,经济,人口,社会,文化,也在进行潜移默化的改变。行动党需要适应;在野党,两党制,多党制,也不是完全没有机会。你准备好了吗?



Comments

  1. F(_)llz avaialable in bulk quantity
    USA UK CANADA all states available

    S_S_N F(_)LLZ
    S_I_N F(_)LLZ
    N_I_N F(_)LLZ
    DL F(_)LLZ

    HERE YOU'LL FIND US

    TG > AT LEADSUPPLIER / AT KILLHACKS
    TG CHANL > t.me/leadsproviderworldwide
    WHT's APP > +1 7.2.7 78.8.6 12.9
    VK MSNGR > AT LEADSUPPLIER

    F(_)LLZ SS.N DOB D.L
    UK N.I.N D.OB Sort Code
    Canada SI.N MM.N Email
    D.L FRONT BACK USA UK CANADA

    MANY LEADS DATABASES AVAILABLE
    CRYPTO & PAYDAY LEADS
    MORTGAGE & LOAN LEADS
    SWEEP STAKES LEADS
    USA EMPLOYEMENT LEADS, PERSONAL INFO LEADS
    UK PHONE NUMBERS & EMAIL LEADS
    CANADA PHONE NUMBER & EMAIL LEADS
    SPECIFIC PROFESSIONALS LEADS
    FACEBOOK, LINKEDIN, AMAZON LEADS
    WORLDWIDE DOMAINS LEADS
    EDUCATION LEADS
    CAR DATABASE LEADS
    W-2 FORMS
    BUSINESS EIN COMPANY LEADS
    HIGH CREDIT SCORES LEADS
    BUSINESS LEADS
    MEDICAL LEADS
    DOCTORS DATABASE LEADS

    #SSN #SSNDOBDL #SellSSN #CCShop #CCSELLCVV #ShopSSNDOBDLADDRESS #FULLZ #SSNFULLZ
    #REALDLSCAN #YoungAgeFullz
    #SIN #SINDOBDL #SellSIN #SINMMNFULLZ #MMNPROSSIN #MMNSIN #CCShop #CCSELLCVV #ShopSINDOBDLADDRESS #FULLZ #SINFULLZ
    #REALDLSCAN #YoungAgeFullz #Fullzseller #CANADAFULLZ #FULLZCANADA
    #NIN #NINDOBDL #SellNIN #CCShop #CCSELLCVV #ShopNINDOBDLADDRESS #FULLZ #NINFULLZ

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...