Skip to main content

忽为短利,让一党独大继续下去。 和谐至上,不应牺牲中下层利益。 大局就是正常化一党独大吗?

 忽为短利,让一党独大继续下去。

和谐至上,不应牺牲中下层利益。

大局就是正常化一党独大吗?


那一次大选,不是为了大局。那一次大选,行动党没有提出恐惧言论来误导选民。似乎,每一次都得手。乱大局是说,行动党失去几个部长吗?我们真的需要这么多部长、市长吗?只有无能的政党,才会害怕失去无用的部长。


不要为了购物券,现金,折扣等短利,而忽视长期的伤害 - 消费税。消费税犹如雪上加霜,在原本高物价的背景下,把通货膨胀推高。


什么叫和谐?行动党有没有公平把经济蛋糕,合理分配给国人,尤其是中下层。面对贫富悬殊,就证明行动党做不到,照顾不到中下层。


做生意的人,都知道竞争。生意人,时时刻刻都要面对不同的竞争。不可能为了和谐,就叫对方不要做生意,不要参与竞争。如果是这么做生意,就像行动党政府,一党独大,别人永远做不起,永远抬不起头,永远只能吃虾米。


什么是”正常“?根据行动党的说法,一党独大是正常。选区随意划分是正常,部长更正言论是正常,消费税、组屋都是正常负担得起,甚至犯错也是正常范围内,如身份证号码,易卡通,部长贪污,。。。


长期以来,中下层的牺牲被当成理所当然,被正常化,制度化。乱大局被说成破坏行动党的正常思维,治国方式。乱大局,就是要打破行动党的思维束缚,改变一党独大的局面,前进正常的政治格局。


为了小利、短利,不要搞乱行动党的大局,结果会是什么?新加坡南部,西部,北部将被闪电笼罩。而东北部也无法突围。新加坡政治,又在原点,继续在小红点徘徊不前。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...