Skip to main content

Lessons from Indian Innovations



India offers different innovation approaches that Singapore can learn from. Her grassroots and inclusive innovations are very unique and worth to consider.

As the Indian initiative heavily involves Information Technology, let’s begin the discussion on Indian Stack.      


[Indian Stack and Internet Access]

To make its IT network more secure, the Singapore government has begun a programme to restrict public servants’ internet access on workstations. It was announced by the Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of Singapore on 8 June 2016. By May 2017, public service officers across all Singapore government agencies, ministries and statutory boards will have internet access “separate” from their computers. (1)

In the name of internet security, we are willing to sacrifice productivity, perhaps, innovations and creativity too.  Is this a good solution?  

Let’s look at India.

India Stack is a complete set of API for developers and includes the Aadhaar for Authentication (Aadhaar already covers over 940 million people and will quickly cover the population of the entire nation), e-KYC documents (safe deposit locker for issue, storage and use of documents), e-Sign (digital signature acceptable under the laws), unified payment interface (for financial transactions) and privacy-protected data sharing within the stack of API. Together, the Indian Stack enables Apps that could open up many opportunities in financial services, healthcare and education sectors of the Indian economy. What this essentially means is that developers and tech startups can now build software and create businesses around the readily available infrastructure offered through India Stack, thus opening a huge potential to tap into the booming smartphone market in the country. Since the consumer market in India is very large, such startups could also hope for institutional funding and gain from the early mover advantage.(2)

Comparing our ‘Internet access restriction’ and Indian Stack, Singapore seems to approach the ‘IT for the people’ problem differently. Will security a concern to Indian Stack which within 5.5 years generate 1 billion users? Certainly, yes. Why are Indians not afraid of internet security issues? In fact, Indian Stack is the faster and cheaper way to reach out to the people. It is a Bottom-up approach. However, in Singapore, we are adopting a Top-down approach. We are worry about the top, the government information, but consider less for the grassroots and inclusiveness.   


[Strong co-operation, lack of understanding]  

Singapore and India had signed a Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) in 2005.  The CECA eliminated tariff barriers, double taxation, duplicate processes and regulations and provided unhindered access and collaboration between the financial institutions of Singapore and India. The CECA also enhanced bilateral collaboration related to education, science and technology, intellectual property,aviation and relaxed visa regulations for Indian professionals in information technology, medicine, engineering and financial fields to emigrate and work in Singapore. Singapore has invested in projects to upgrade India's ports, airports and developing information technology parks and a Special Economic Zone (SEZ). India has become Singapore's 4th biggest tourist destination and more than 650,000 Indians visited Singapore in 2006. Both nations have worked to collaborate on aviation, aerospace engineering, space programmes, information technology, biotechnology and energy.(3)

Singapore wants to have more co-operations with India. Our Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam listed education, connectivity, smart cities as areas of further collaboration.

The Straits Times made the following report:

{"It frankly gives me confidence in India, not just based on what has been happening in the last few years of GDP growth above 7 per cent, but confidence that this is now a new journey that we in Singapore want to be part of, contribute to and want to benefit from at the same time," he said, listing financial connectivity, air connectivity, education and skills and smart cities as areas of further collaboration.} (4)


We are familiar with India since independence in 1965. India is one of the three major races here and Tamil is one of our four official languages.

Have we capitalised on this historical relationship? Yes. Perhaps, it only takes place in the G-to-G level and the Singapore government-linked companies. Our private sector and small businesses have not benefited from CECA. Again, this is due to the Top-down consideration, quite different from the Bottom-up approach of doing business in India.  


[Indian Innovations]

Singaporeans are too familiar with the government Top-down approach in solving problems. We are called a Singapore Inc. We do things in a very formal and corporate way. We ignore the grassroots and inclusive problems.

It is good to understand there are five types of Indian innovations: Grassroots, Inclusive, Frugal, Reverse and Invisible. For Singapore, we only look at who can afford to buy.  But India is a market that needs low-cost solutions to meet the poor-man demands.   

Here are the video links of the five Indian innovations:







[Top-down approach]

Before we touch on the Indian innovations, let’s look at our national innovation program.  In 2006, Singapore government established the National Research Foundation (NRF) and her vision is to develop ‘Singapore as a vibrant science & technology hub, with R&D contributing significantly to a knowledge-intensive, innovative and entrepreneurial economy.’ (5)

The NRF board of directors are key ministers, international academics and corporate leaders. This high-level council underscores the political commitment to and importance placed on the national R&D agenda.

It is clearly a top-down approach in R&D and innovations. And of course,  NRF is looking for solutions and breakthroughs for the rich and middle-class consumers.

While in India, they are using different approaches, both involving top-down and bottom-up R&D approaches, academic and non-academic personnel, inclusive rather than exclusive markets and audiences.

If we are serious about the Indian market, we need a mindset change. India is a disorganised market, emerging market with a lot of poor consumers. Our NRF is focusing only on rich market and neglects the unaffordable poor market. This will limit our innovation development and potential. And our businesses, if adopting the same attitude, may find no market in India.

We know India and we have many Indians, either citizens or residents, living here. But yet, we have not discovered India in a deeper sense. We only look at the rich Indians and forget the potential of poor Indians.  

Notes:

(1)

(2)
http://pn.ispirt.in/india-stack-takes-the-digital-india-campaign-to-a-whole-new-level/
http://www.slideshare.net/CGAP/what-is-the-india-stack

(3)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Singapore_relations

(4)
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/singapore-wants-more-cooperation-with-india

(5)
http://www.nrf.gov.sg/about-nrf/national-research-foundation-singapore/corporate-profile#sthash.NZleP23T.dpuf

Comments

  1. Great information. Thanks for sharing this blog. we at Remunance provide End to End payroll administration right from employee joining to full & final settlement.
    For more information login: Payroll Outsourcing Company in India

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...