Skip to main content

Singapore economy, likes MRT, faces breakdown and disruption uncertainties




Image result for mrt breakdowns
Is MRT breakdown a good physical exercise?

When Singapore Mass Rapid Transit system was first introduced in the 1980s, we could never imagine frequent breakdowns or disruptions. However, this has become a certainty now. No disruption or breakdown has gone and the reality is we have to face and bear this uncertainty or unexpected certainty.

Will our economy also face the same challenge, the uncertainty, likes our MRT system?

While will our government also face the same challenge, the uncertainty, likes our MRT system?

In the past, we were very proud of our MRT, our economy, our government, but now we are not sure when unexpected disruptions and breakdowns will come. This means we will have more uncertainties and more risks.   

Interestingly PM Lee Hsien Loong speaking to union leaders, using a medical analogy, said Singapore economy only needs to do more exercises but no medicine.    

{ "In 2008, 2009, it was a crisis, we were sick, we needed medicine, we took antibiotics. One course of powerful medicine, we recovered. Luckily the germs also stopped coming and we were okay. But this is not that kind of infection that we can take a quick medicine to cure," he said before a closed-door dialogue with participants. "This one you see the doctor, the doctor says, ‘No you don’t need me. You need to see a physical trainer. You need to build up your muscles, you need to build up your skills you need to strengthen yourself. You need to keep at it. Several months, you’ll see a difference. A few years, you’ll be a different person.’" } #1

Perhaps, he is suggesting the frequent MRT breakdowns and disruptions are good for your bodies, so that you can do more physical exercises, running to catch transfer buses or walking in the dark tunnels. And so you become healthier, more fit to face the uncertainties?   

PM Lee also declares there is no economic crisis but go and do more physical exercises. You will be OK after your hard labour and training.

However, if you read Chee Soon Juan’s “After 15 years, the results are in and it is clear that Lee Hsien Loong has failed” , you get confused. Dr Chee reminds us:

{Now that the 15 years is nearly up, it is pertinent to ask what has been achieved. Apparently not much, according to Mr Lee himself. As he confessed this week: “We are feeling the pains of restructuring, but not yet seeing the dividends of our hard work.” } #2
               
So, who is to believe?

Will the delisting of SMRT good for system restructuring or another 15 years of failure?

By next week, we will have to face the first uncertainty - The Trans-Pacific Partnership.  To PM Lee, he is still talking and dreaming about TPP.  But this is already a certainty as both US Presidential hopefuls have said No to TPP. Why does a certainty become an uncertainty in the eyes of PM Lee? What we should study is what next after TPP - the uncertainty of a failed TPP. This is the reality and what will be the disruptions caused by the failure?

Are we putting too much attentions to TPP and distance ourselves to “One Belt, One Road”? TPP and “One Belt, One Road”, which one is carrying more uncertainties and risks?

We are not sure about another financial crisis? In fact, after every crisis, the GINI coefficient index will go up and the rich-poor gap will widen. We may need to use our reserve again.   

Just like the MRT breakdowns, some commuters will be affected.  Those affected commuters will have to do more physical exercise. Others will continue to enjoy their journeys and have a normal life.  Of course, we also have people outside the MRT system. They use another mode of transportation.  Comparatively, they can maintain their productivity while MRT commuters will suffer a drop in productivity due to MRT disruptions.

Will the partial disruptions of MRT spread to the whole MRT system? This means besides physical exercises, we not only need medicine perhaps an operation (economic restructuring) too. The whole economy will be affected, not some industries, by the breakdowns of external economy.

PM Lee thinks Singapore is not facing an economic crisis. He thinks only some industries are having problems, lower down the growth rate and productivity needs to improve. Hence, he suggests doing exercises to improve the productivity.

If we look at the MRT problems, is it a productivity problem or cultural, maintenance or other problems? By delisting SMRT, will the productivity increase or decrease? There are many unknowns, for example, the signalling problems, power problems, integration problems…

Like the MRT system, Singapore economy is also adding more lines, more industries. It has become so complicated and sophisticated, so much so we do not have advance notice of the illegal banking of 1MDB.

If we only need to do exercises to overcome the temporary economic problems as suggested by PM Lee, we may fail to understand the sophistication and complexity of Singapore economic structure. Today’s MRT system and economy have different structure as compared to even 5 years ago. Different individuals, families, and companies will face different issues. Some individuals, families and companies will have a very difficult time ahead even there is no economic crisis.  Is this just a simple exercise problem?



#1  http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/spore-not-crisis-long-term-strategy-structural-problem-place-pm-lee

#2
(http://www.cheesoonjuan.com/home/after-15-years-the-results-are-in-and-it-is-clear-that-lee-hsien-loong-has-failed)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...