Skip to main content

Chok Tong is a liability, not an asset. Plus the Aljunied Effect in Marine Parade.

2015 PAP Strategy 战略 9


[Goh Chok Tong owes Singaporeans an explanation for the failed Swiss standard of living and a divided Singapore. Further away from the border battle, drinking coffee at Parkway Parade he forgets the Aljuined effect.]


Aljuined effect Marine Parade.jpg
Goh is in the white area. Has he seen things outside his white area? Voters must not miss the big picture.


 

{If I were Chok Tong, I will leave the battle to the young generation and enjoy life overseas with my million dollars savings.  I have seen the 3rd and some 4th generation leaders.  All cannot match the same high standard as LKY. Since I cannot change the fate of the PAP, why border so much. I cannot make the impossible possible. Right.}

In many ways, Goh Chok Tong is a heavier liability than Lui Tuck Yew. He is the second prime minister as well as the leader of the second generation PAP leaders. Made a PM in 1990, he is responsible for the past 25 years of development in Singapore. He first made decisions for government and later advised the Lee Hsien Loong government.

Lui is only in charge of the transport portfolio.  He is not giving direction of the country.  While Goh is different. Being a PM, today’s Singapore is his product. He cannot say he is not responsible unless the rumour is true (he is a PM with no final say).

In GE2015, Marine Parade GRC voters must judge him on this basis. He cannot say the high income inequality, population, medical, housing, reserve, CPF, education, and social engagement problems have nothing to do with him. He cannot run away and must defend and justify the high ministerial salary, high medical fees, high housing price, high CPF minimum sum and medisave.

It is why the GRC team leader, Tan Chuan-Jin wants to make it a low key, low profile election.

[Mr Tan tells Insight that his team's focus remains the same - helping residents and building community ties. He says: "In many ways, there's no particular strategy. Are we doing anything different? No. The work goes on, regardless of who comes." ]
www.straitstimes.com/politics/will-pap-shore-up-marine-parade

If we look at Goh at just a constituency problem, then we miss the big picture. Goh is responsible for the state of Singapore today. When he was warned of a divided Singapore by Catherine Lim#1 in 1994, he failed to improve the gap between the PAP and the people. If he has done his job, why is a need to urgently promote inclusive society, ‘one nation one Singapore’ now? Why is there a need to make a strategic change of promoting ‘democratic socialism’? And the new NTUC chief Chan Chun Sing crying high and low for ‘socialist heart’?

Goh Chok Tong and Lee Hsien Loong jointly make the disappearance of the socialist heart.  In the past 25 years, Goh in effect has made policies without the social heart. Voters must judge him and ask him where has the social heart gone to. The social heart has already buried by the million dollars of high salary.

The myth of Nicole Seah and Tin Pei Ling

With the socialist heart disappeared, voters in GE2011 looked for sweetheart. Immediately, they found one and loved her. This made the full GRC election between a sweetheart and heartless PAP.  
Voters just ignored Goh Chok Tong as he could no longer united his team and brought the election into bigger issue, at least to GRC level.

Nicole Seah made Goh Chok Tong becoming insignificant. She also made other members of Goh team insignificant.  It looked more like a sweetheart against a 5-member PAP team.

Was it a total picture in Marine Parade GRC in GE2011?

We need to consider another factor. Aljunied and Marine Parade GRCs are just side-by-side.  Voters in Marine Parade did regularly attended WP rallies in Aljunied. The huge turnover could not be just Aljunied voters alone.

So, there is an Aljunied effect. Except Goh Chok Tong’s Marine Parade constituency, all other constituencies in the GRC are next to Aljunied. Cross friends, relatives, even coffee shop and hawker centres visits are daily occurrences. Goh may intentionally ignore this fact or perhaps he does not think it is a real challenge.

Now with official participation of Workers’ Party in Marine Parade GRC, it is even more dangerous for the PAP, especially when voters look at the national issues, a divided Singapore.  It is too comfortable drinking coffee at Parkway Parade and not understanding the front battle.

Let’s wish WP all the best and if possible, be a volunteer to help WP wins Marine Parade GRC.  

#1
http://catherinelim.sg/1994/09/03/the-pap-and-the-people-a-great-affective-divide/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...