Skip to main content

Celebrating SG50, Celebrating the End of One-party Rule.


Celebrating SG50 is a closing chapter for Singapore politics and economy. It is the end of the one-party rule of the PAP and the beginning of the participation of alternative politics. All of us, whether supporting or opposing the PAP, will agree that the PAP will lose more parliamentary seats. PM Lee even warned that the PAP might lose power in the next election.

So, when we celebrate SG50, we are also celebrating the emergence of two-party or multiparty politics in Singapore. The celebration of the past, like SG50 and the memory of walkovers, GRCs, NCMPs, will unlikely to be the ‘history repeats itself’. To the PAP, the creation of SG50 is to dream of a ‘history repeats itself’.  However, this is not a realistic sweet dream. SG50 is a closing chapter for the PAP monopoly politics.  

It will be a new political arrangement, a new economic arrangement, perhaps, a new legal and social order.

Two-party or multiparty

Past election data shows the possibility of two-party system rather than a multi-party arrangement. The PAP popular votes will go down, to what level? 55%, 50% or even 45%. Even with 45%, the PAP may still remain in power with a simple majority. In a first-past-the-post system, like PE2011, the PAP can still win with more than 30% support in a multi-corner contest.

For an opposition party with a past record of 40% popular support, it is not an easy task to unseat the PAP. We may see one or two outliers with very strong opposition candidates and ground works.  If the outliers become a norm, and if that happens, it will be a freak election - the biggest worry of the PAP. Then, it will bring forward the multiparty politics in Singapore.

What will cause a freak election? It must be something very big and at a national level. For example, the reserve and CPF.  Suddenly, evident shows the reserve is gone and CPF Board has no money.  Exchange rate and property price can also lead to freak election. Euro crisis, financial crisis and big falling in real estate value had brought down governments.

Sustainable growth

When we celebrate SG50, we will also have to accept a slow growth economy. With 2-4% growth, it is possible some sectors may experience negative growth, some sectors may not be able to restructure and productivity growth will continue to be a problem.

The PAP calls it a sustainable growth. Whether sustainable growth or slower growth, Singapore will be very different from the SG50 era. PM Lee wants to project a prosperity future but fails to bring out solid and sustainable solutions. The PAP’s foundation is high growth, high inequality, and less social support. They have no solutions for low growth, equality and more social support. Alternative inputs and solutions are needed in these areas.

International Commercial Court

Singapore International Commercial Court is a new business venture.  Comparing this to casino business under SG50, we can’t say this is bad. However, this legal venture needs strong political and economic infrastructure.

Moving from one-party to two-party or multiparty politics will strengthen the tribunal business. An international court, whether commercial or criminal, needs the support of democratic system and open economy.  It has a higher chance of success if we go beyond the mindset of SG50.

Interestingly, Chief Justice also announced the setting up  
of a Centralised College for training and educating judges. In many ways, in the post SG50 era, judges will have to consider the new political and economic reality. Training and educating judges accepting the new reality should be part of the college programs.

Society at large

More social involvements, especially the young and social media, will be new reality. The PAP cannot solve all the problems in Singapore.  It is also difficult to hide the problems or issues like the past.  The harmony in the past will not be repeated. There is no more honeymoon for the PAP. Newly elected parliamentary representatives will have shorter learning curve. The planned and ordered PAP succession format, from minister of state to minister, will be a joke after SG50.

We will also see more social activities, from cat, dog, toilet, kindness, religion to red dot.  Singaporeans will demand more transparency and openness. Temple business, unlicensed trade fair, charity donations, $2 company will have hard time in the post SG50.

In 2015, we welcome SG50. In celebration of SG50, we turn the past impossible into reality. The end of the PAP’s monopoly means a new beginning for Singapore, even it is a challenging one.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...