Our million-dollar and paper general ministers need to
know more about the history and role of military in Indonesia. Ministers speaking
on the naming issue of an Indonesian navy ship have exposed themselves their
ignorance in history and military as a key institution in some countries.
In our ASEAN region, the role of military in Thailand,
Myanmar, Vietnam and of course, Indonesia and the Philippines is or was an
important pillar in maintaining social orders and stability (no matter we like
it or not, whether they are right or wrong).
In the Muslin world, we also see the traditional role
of military in nation-state building of Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq and even
the troubled Syria.
The role of military is a unique feature of
institution in some countries, including Indonesia. This is especially true
when the civil institutions are weak, fail to deliver and build up the nation.
The military in this case is the only institution due to its discipline can
hold the country together. Just a little
hint, more than 100 Indonesian ‘disciplined’ military personnel as a bloc are
absent from the Singapore Airshow.
This is why we always hear that there may be a
military coup in Thailand due to the recent political crisis. The military in
Turkey thinks they have a duty to remind the civilian administration their role
in nation building. So do the military in Pakistan and Egypt.
The military as an institution has to keep their
promises and position themselves as a protector of the nation. Even though they
may make mistakes in the past, for example military coups, they still maintain
their position and continue their role that they think is right. These promises
include honouring the dead soldiers as shown in the case of Japan (further
discussion later) have become a tradition.
So when Sukarno as a military leader ordered the two
marines to plant the bombs at MacDonald House, even his opponent Suharto cannot
deny the contributions of the two marines to the Indonesian military. So, despite differences, from Sukarno to
Suharto, the two camps in the Indonesian military still have to agree with the
sacrifice of the two marines. Leadership changed hands but the military
continues as one institution and honour its promise.
So when the marines become heroes, the role of
military as one voice has to recognise this fact. And they had demanded Singapore to do some
things:
[“Singapore had considered this difficult chapter in the bilateral relationship closed in May 1973 when then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew visited and scattered flowers on the graves of the two marines,”] #1
It is not clear whether scattered flowers are a way to
recognise the two marines as heroes or just a good will gesture. Each
side may have different interpretations and Indonesian military would also have
its own reading. This perhaps has become
the tradition interpretation of the military. Not to forget even current President
Yudhoyono who is linked to the military cannot break this tradition.
When Lee Kuan Yew agreed to scatter flowers, he too
has his interpretation. Why this
understanding was not transferred to the paper generals who supposed to have a
better military understanding and reading?
How about Japanese occupation
The MacDonald House bombing happened when the PAP was
in power. How about the killings during Japanese Occupation? The PAP seems to
have different memories.
Singapore remains silent whenever Japanese leaders pay
their respects at Shinto shrine. Prime Minister Abe told reporters in late 2013:
["I prayed to pay respect for the war dead who sacrificed their precious lives and hoped that they rest in peace," ]#2
We
are concern and dismay on the naming of the Indonesian war ship. And we don’t
have any feeling about the killing during the Japanese occupation. If you are part
of Indonesian military, what will be your reading?
Singapore’s
position at the two killings (MacDonald House and World War II) is contradicting.
If we oppose the naming of the Indonesian war ship, we should also oppose the
visit of shrine visits by Japanese leaders. Is this because Japan is a bigger
economy than that of Indonesia? Is this because the British as colony master has a duty
to answer to the World War II dead in Singapore and not the PAP? I would like to leave this to your imagination
and judgement!
Quality
of our ministers
5
Singapore million-dollar and paper-general ministers have commented on the war
ship naming. Now comparing their comments with their Indonesian counterparts, I
don’t see their arguments or debates better than their counterparts.
They
are of course very happy to see the commentary of Jakarta Post that seems to be on
their side and calling the naming an insensitive act. Is our silent on killings during Japanese
occupation sensitive or insensitive? Maybe we always like to choose the easier
route and choose the area of our responsibility?
If
the PAP thinks the social media and Internet are irresponsible, what about
their own ministers on the naming issue? They thought they could score
political points by ‘defending’ Singaporean interests. Unfortunately, their arguments
are so weak and unintelligent (I hope readers do have time to read the comments
on both sides).
We
have to acknowledge that Indonesia is a big country with big population. A
certain percentage of their population is smarter than us and receives much
less than a million dollar salary. We have to be humble and accept the fact of
history, the role of military of other countries. Our ignorance of historical
fact will make us weak in defending Singaporean interest. A better understanding
and appreciation of history will strengthen our positions and debates.
So,
do Singapore ministers need an urgent course on history, on constitutions, on press
freedom? Perhaps the most urgent one is on political competition as they will
face more demanding voters and stronger opponents. Understanding the past history of political competitions
and the monopoly role of the PAP may help them a bit. But will they take up the history lesson when
they already have their millions?
#1
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/singapore-registers-concerns-over-indonesian-navy-ship-20140206
#2
http://news.yahoo.com/japanese-prime-minister-visits-yasukuni-war-shrine-025340271.html
Sorry, I think in this case, the Indons are to be blamed.
ReplyDeleteSoldiers fighting a declared war and dieing in action are indeed heroes. But soldiers disguised as civilians and attacking civilian buildings and killing and maiming civilians are more terrorists than soldiers, let alone heroes. There is no excuse in "we are only following orders". Those who commit atrocities under orders are still subject to be tried as war criminals.
LKY scattered flower petals on the graves was to appease their souls and to bring closure to this sorry episode. They committed premeditated murders, they were tried, and hanged. Justice served, our principle demonstrated, and time to forgive and forget.
And then the Indons decided to re-open the issue by naming their friggiing frigates after saboteurs.
/// In the Muslin world, we also see the traditional role of military in nation-state building of Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq and even the troubled Syria.///
Muslin is a loosely woven cotton fabric.
A good neutral article:
ReplyDeletehttp://americanadmiraltybooks.blogspot.sg/2014/02/naval-interest-singapore-and-indonesia.html
OUR OPINION: As veterans of the U.S. naval services including at least one veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps we can understand the feelings of the families of the executed marines. "They were just following orders". But we also have to agree that if there was a specific order to take out an office building that was probably an illegal order under the international law of armed conflict. If they chose their own target it was an illegal and immoral choice.
The international community affirmed in the 1940s at the Nuremberg Tribunals that "obeying military orders" is not a defense against carrying out crimes against humanity and violations of the laws of armed conflict. Soldiers are not supposed to be merely armed thugs sponsored by the state.
It's very interesting to read.
ReplyDeletewow, great, I was wondering how to cure acne naturally. and found your site by google, learned a lot, now i’m a bit clear. I’ve bookmark your site and also add rss. keep us updated. 24hr time
ReplyDelete