Skip to main content

The Unique Chinese Dilemma In Singapore

Should English become the mother tongue for Singaporean Chinese? To some, this is not a question. For many young kids growing up in an English environment, perhaps this is a funny question as they are so used to think everything in English and even consider themselves a product of ‘English’.  It is a known secret that some kids hate Chinese in schools.

However, I am not talking about this type of dilemma. This man-made dilemma is of course a product of the People’s Action Party. It certainly shows the effectiveness of our bilingualism education as well as our bi-cultural programs. And in fact, the PAP government only wants the top 10% or 20% of students to be bilingual and bi-cultural. So, the majority of younger generation of local born Singaporeans will need to master English only.  

For the continuation and maintenance of local Chinese language, culture and tradition, the burden has to go to this top 10-20% people plus a few more Singaporeans who are interested on these subjects. The rest of Singaporean Chinese will have less association or contact with their father’s or grandfather’s culture, customs and tradition.   

This is the current dilemma and perhaps a small one comparing to the future one.

Will we be eating more of this in future? 
source: eat.tanspace.com
Will we be eating less of this in future?
source: primasingaporesauces.com

Will Chinese language and culture die off in future Singapore?  The answer is no.  This is why I call it a unique dilemma and perhaps it can only take place in Singapore. We will likely to see a diluted original (Southern Chinese Guangdong and Fujian) Singapore Chinese culture joining an expanded and ‘overall’ Chinese culture from different regions of China.

And this more representative or well represented Chinese culture may be too alien or too foreign to some Singaporeans, not to mention speak-only English Singaporeans.  This is why we hear the comment of ‘we are like staying in a Chinese city’?

Yes, indeed this is emerging.  Even though we don’t have the official figure of non-locally born Chinese in Singapore, it is easy to estimate the figure by just using the racial ratio of 75% Chinese. For 5 million populations, we will have 3.75 million Chinese. For 6.9 million populations, we will have 5.18 million Chinese.  To make up this figure, a lot of them will have to come from China as our birth rate is too low.

The bigger dilemma will be we will have a very different Chinese culture in Singapore - a different culture that even Chinese educated Singaporeans may find it difficult to adjust and adapt.  When the Chinese educated Singaporeans become an extinct, we will then see an even bigger social divide: a speak English only population and a part-bilingual part-Mandarin speaking population.

This is unique because our own Chinese culture (or is there one remaining?) is being transformed by a bigger and more powerful Chinese culture coming from all over China.  The PAP government likes to see this happening as we can have all business connections all over China. But can Singapore as a whole handle the situation well?  The elites may think so in pure economic terms but what about the larger population.   

This is very different from the USA, UK or France. You can find Chinatowns in New York, London or Paris; however, the individual country still maintains their own culture and language even the size of Chinese population grows.   

It is an interesting development and the drama has just begun. The issue goes beyond whether Singaporeans are anti-foreigners or not.  Certainly, it also goes beyond the question of whether we should consider English as our mother’s tongue. When the wise man of bilingualism goes into history, will he also bring along this dilemma with him?

If not, the future generation of Singaporeans whether born or not born in Singapore will have to think a way out to solve this dilemma. Perhaps, this will make us stronger and become a reformed Singapore re-emphasizing our past!

PS

Just some updates on statistics on weibo accounts in Singapore from omy.sg: There are 1.5 million registered accounts and 800,000 daily active members.

据报道,受委负责新加坡微博业务公司Trends Media的Jimmy Li说,新加坡在新浪微博注册用户数排名第四,拥有150万注册用户,每天有80万活跃用户。虽然大部分新加坡人在使用Facebook、Twitter、Instagram,他说该公司并非与这些平台竞争,而是要抢占使用中文者的市场(约三分之一新加坡人口)。新浪微博计划覆盖新加坡三分之一人口,达到200万注册用户和150万日活跃用户。 - See more at: http://gosocial.omy.sg/GoSocial/In-the-Buzz/Xin-Lang-Wei-Bo-Ren-Zheng-Jin-Ru-Xin-Jia-Po-Shi-Chang-201044#sthash.hBIy738p.dpuf



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...