Skip to main content

How come the “Finest” worth so much at NTUC Finest –is it having the same group thinking as the PAP?

[Is NTUC Fair Price following the footstep of SMRT? Have they forgotten their principle duty as a social enterprise to help lower income families? SMRT goes beyond the services of commuters and NTUC beyond the interest of lower income families.]
Finest or not, after all NTUC is still a co-operative. A co-operative even how fine it is it is still a cooperative with the objective of helping the lower income families, the people at large and ordinary citizens.

Pay more to shop at NTUC Finest 
I am shock to find out the renovated Hougang A NTUC Supermarket now renamed as NTUC Finest can offer ordinary items as expensive as the nearby Cold Storage or even dearer.

Perhaps, NTUC has forgotten they are a co-operative, a social enterprise, as PM Lee and union leaders have also stressed.  NTUC is to help citizens to fight inflation and lower down the cost of living for Singaporeans. And now the word “finest” means expensive after a name change and renovation.

It looks like NTUC is just doing the opposite (finest in price only), just like the HDB housing and the hawkers’ stalls. After upgrading with new design and facilities, HDB demands higher selling prices for HDB flats or higher rental of hawkers’ stalls.

Price adjustment after renovation

Price adjustment always comes after renovation or upgrade. The PAP does it so do the NTUC.

NTUC Finest Hougang A



Here are some selected daily items and their price differences between NTUC Finest and Supermarket.








NTUC Finest
Hougang A
NTUC Toa Payoh A and City Sq
Price adjustment
Red spinach
$1.35/300g
$0.80/220g
0.45/0.364 =
23.6%up
Baby spinach
$1.50/300g
$1.00/220g
0.5/0.455 =
9.9% up
Tomato 100g
$0.22 (big)
$0.15 (small and medium)
0.22/0.15 =
46.7% up
Bread blue packaging
Not offer
$1.15
NA

NTUC City Sq
Before the renovation in May 2013, the Hougang A NTUC Supermarket offered the same prices as the other two stores in Toa Payoh and City Sq. In term of location and rental, I don’ think Hougang A is in a better location and having to higher rental.  I also doubt there is a rental increase after renovation.

But consumers have to pay for the renovation costs and the “finest” goods and services. I don’t see the difference in quality (for spinach I brought at NTUC Finest) or service.  In fact, the price tags were not displayed for the spinach and so as regular customers, I don’t pay attention even there is no listing of price. I only notice the difference after payment.   

NTUC Toa Payoh A
If the price adjustments for some daily necessaries can increase by at least 10%, plus the cheapest range of products, like the blue packaging house brand bread, are not on offer; how can NTUC Fair Price help to lower the living burden of common people.

Not to forget in the neighborhood of Kovan MRT, there is only one NTUC Supermarket (now Finest). This means residents have to go to both expensive supermarkets (Cold S and Finest) for their daily needs.

If you are the only supermarket, with a social enterprise spirit of fighting inflation, in the neighborhood, why are you running away and joining the commercial enterprise and forming the oligopoly competition in the area?  

If there are two NTUC Fair Prices in the same area, then the rational of one goes upmarket and the other serves the lower income people seems logical.   
But the situation near Kovan MRT is different.  There is only one NTUC.

Quite obviously, NTUC Fair Price is doing the same thing like the PAP government. They have the same group thinking, whether running the country or running a social enterprise.

NTUC is a mirror of government polices

The name “Finest” has many implications. For medical care, lower income families are facing Class C or B options, or for middle income families the choice of government or private hospitals.

For education, students can go to the “finest” independent schools, or neighborhood schools.

For HDB, you can apply for the “finest” EC flats or normal HDB flats.

For COE, you can go for the “finest” above 1600cc cars or small cars.

No cheap alternatives at NTUC Finest

So, shopping at NTUC, you still have an option, you can go to the Finest and spend more or go to a normal supermarket but you may not get one in your neighborhood, like the case of Kovan MRT.

Yes. The government supplies options, choices and alternatives, but like the Hougang A NTUC Finest, you may not have the opportunities to shop at the NTUC supermarkets elsewhere. However, if you insist to do so, you will have to spend more time and money travelling to the nearer NTUC supermarkets outside your neighborhood.

Upgrade to Finest voters?

Kovan MRT is within Paya Lebar –Aljunied GRC.  

One reason I can think of for the renamed NTUC Finest is NTUC has quietly upgraded the Aljunied residents and voters to the finest people in Singapore.

We are now giving the chance to shop at the finest supermarket.  Of course, as customers and residents, you too have to be “finest” too.

But there is (an expensive) price to pay for getting this finest honour by shopping at Hungang A NTUC Finest!

Perhaps, same to the PAP too!  It will be another expensive lesson to learn from (not) helping Singaporeans.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...