Skip to main content

Closing down state broadcaster, what does it mean?


The Greece Prime Minster wants to close down the state broadcaster ERT but the decision was overturned by the highest Court.  It, of course, has nothing to do with Singapore.  However, if we look further into the issue, it has many meanings to us.

Lack of transparency, Purpose of state broadcaster and alternative media, Protection of Job and Independence of Court

In Singapore, it is out of imagination the PAP government will close down Mediacorp and its television and radio stations. So, why does the Greece government think otherwise?

The reasons given by the Prime Minister Antonis Samaras are very strange to us:
“ERT suffered from chronic mismanagement, lack of transparency and waste.”{BBC}
A Prime Minister is accusing his state-owned broadcaster “lack of transparency”.

While in Singapore, this will never happen as we all know the clear position of mainstream media. It will be very interesting to find out why the government owned broadcaster in Greece becomes “lack of transparency”.  Is it because of the multi-party politics and frequent changes of government leading to the broadcaster does not know who is the “real” master?

The importance of alternative media

If the state broadcaster is to be closed down, it means the existence of state television and radio stations has very little value to the government. Just ask yourself can the PAP live and function without the MSM? Of course, not.

The Greece PM must have found alternative media to communicate to the people. There are, of course, alternative private broadcasters in Greece which can help the government to do the transmission work.

However, the most important contribution is the Internet and social media. Government can communicate with the citizens through Facebook, twitter and other social media. The future development of social media will be an effective alternative to traditional media. 

Perhaps, in the case of Greece, this is the reason why even without a state broadcaster, there are other communication channels that can effectively communicate government policies, rules and regulations, changes in administration procedures etc. to the people.

Considering this development and the recent MDA new licensing requirements, you can easily guess why the PAP has to come out with the new security bonds and notice on removal of articles. The PAP is still very tradition and does not know how to face the challenges and development of social media in Singapore. 

Protection of Job

Another interesting about the Greece story (full BBC report below) is who will protect the job of the broadcaster workers. The government says no and is ready to fire the workers. The union has come forward to file the case in the Court. 

It is interesting to see the outcome of same case in Singapore. If the PAP wants to close down Mediacorp, will the union in Singapore protest and file the case in the Court?

In Singapore, the likely outcome will be some things like the following:

Union members file their cases against union 
 http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/03/27/breaking-union-members-go-to-court-when-union-fails-to-represent-their-interests/
 http://therealsingapore.com/content/141-union-members-behind-court-application-against-their-union  

So, union members may have privileges in club facilities and bookings, but whether their rights are well protected or not is another question.  

Independence of Court.

If the same case goes to the Court in Singapore, what will be the outcome? The Greece Court seems to give a win-win ruling.

[A Greek court has ordered that state broadcaster ERT, which was shut down by the government last week, can resume transmissions. 

However, the court also upheld a plan by Prime Minister Antonis Samaras to replace ERT with a smaller broadcaster.] (BBC)

The union wins in short term and the government wins in the long term (by end of year). 

Is this win-win ruling showing the independence of the Court in Greece? Or all of them are playing politics.

Full BBC report as follows:

Greece court orders state broadcaster ERT back on air

A Greek court has ordered that state broadcaster ERT, which was shut down by the government last week, can resume transmissions.
However, the court also upheld a plan by Prime Minister Antonis Samaras to replace ERT with a smaller broadcaster.
The ruling came as Mr Samaras and his coalition partners - furious that they had not been consulted about ERT's closure - held crisis talks.
The prime minister's decision triggered mass protests across the country.

The leading party in the governing coalition, the conservative New Democracy, said last Tuesday that ERT suffered from chronic mismanagement, lack of transparency and waste.
It shut the broadcaster down with the loss of nearly 2,700 jobs. Viewers saw TV screens go black as the signal was switched off.
Greece's top administrative court - the Council of State - upheld Mr Samaras's plan to replace ERT with a new broadcaster later this year but backed the position of the other coalition partners that the signal must be restored in the interim.
Some ERT journalists have continued live broadcasts unauthorised over the internet, and when the ruling came through, a strapline across the screen said: "In a few hours ERT will be broadcasting everywhere."

'Seven nights'

The case was brought by ERT's union in an attempt to overturn Mr Samaras's surprise move.
The BBC's Mark Lowen in Athens says each side will claim victory, but in the end the unity of the government has been badly weakened.
During talks, Mr Samaras had suggested a new, leaner, cheaper broadcaster would be established within weeks and he proposed hiring a small team to produce news programmes in the interim.
But this idea was rejected by his two coalition partners - Evangelos Venizelos of Pasok and Fotis Kouvelis of the Democratic Left.
"The court decision is essentially in line with what we've said: no one has the right to shut down national radio and television and turn screens black," said Mr Kouvelis after the emergency talks ended.

Opposition party Syriza staged a protest in Syntagma Square on Monday evening
Mr Venizelos said they would meet again on Wednesday to discuss a cabinet reshuffle.
An official from New Democracy said the ruling affirmed the government's position that ERT had been scrapped.

The row has threatened to topple the government and force Greece into snap elections, triggering political turmoil with implications for the whole eurozone.

ERT workers celebrated outside the broadcaster's headquarters after hearing the court ruling.

"I've been here seven nights and this is the first time I've seen people smile," said reporter Eleni Hrona.
However, our correspondent says there is also the recognition that later this year many will lose their jobs as a smaller broadcaster is formed.

Meanwhile, as coalition leaders went into talks, the main opposition party Syriza held a rally in Athens' Syntagma Square to demand early elections.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...