Skip to main content

A different Johor means better and stronger oppositions in Singapore


What do I mean by a different Johor? It means a state no more a ‘fixed deposit’ for UNMO and Barisan Nasional. Voters (especially Chinese voters) in Johor will follow the mainstream voters in Malaysia in rejecting BN on 5 May 2013 and become less ‘influenced’ from Singapore.

Malaysian Nanyang reported yesterday BN may lose 10 federal and 16 state seats to PR in the coming election in Johor state. If this is true, this will be the first time, BN is losing so much ‘fixed deposits’ to the oppositions in Johor.  BN only lost 1 federal seat in 2008.

Because of this development, Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin brought out the case of Singapore to caution and warn Johor voters. In today’s Sin Chew, the DPM said Singaporeans were worried about a win of DAP Lim Kit Siang in Gelang Patah parliament constituency and the aftermath of the slow development in Iskandar.   

Perhaps, he is referring to the People’s Action Party not the ordinary people of Singapore. The PAP, likes UNMO, has been the dominant party in Singapore for more than 50 years. A fall of BN government means the PAP may follow the same route years later.     

Alternative parties in Singapore would like to see a Pakatan Rakyat (PR) win in Malaysia GE 2013.  There are many things Singapore oppositions can learn from PR including the election strategies and recruitment of high quality candidates.

Singapore has more influences in Johor?   

Many Chinese Johoreans are working in Singapore. Their children are educating in Singapore schools and most importantly, they listen and watch Mediacorp programs (TV8, channelU, 958 etc.).  When Kuala Lumpur or Penang experienced reformasi movements or even Bersih clean election movements, Chinese Johoreans were less concerns about these.

They act and behave differently from other northern Malaysians.  Not only the Chinese are different, the Malays in Johor are also different.      
[Barisan chairman Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said Johor was very important for the coalition as it was the place where the struggle for modern Malaysia began. Najib said the state's culture of moderation and accommodation known as "The Johor Way" had contributed greatly to its success. He said "The Johor Way" included the moderate and accommodating practices adopted by the state Barisan Nasional-led government, which had seen Johor prosper and remain free of any serious conflict.]http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Malaysia/Story/A1Story20130430-419314.html

‘The Johor Way’ looks more like a BN way and an UNMO way of deposit.   In some ways, it is also similar to the PAP’s ‘The Singapore Way’.   Group Representative Constituencies are the PAP’s way of election deposits.   However, we have seen the breakthrough in Aljunied.  So, the Johor voters saw this in 2011 and later they also saw the 2 by-elections defeats of the PAP.   As a result, they begin to ask why?   

The PAP is such a strong and capable political party in the world and yet it still can lose ‘election fixed deposit’, then how about Johor state? How about Malaysia as a whole? BN government in many ways is less efficient, less effective and less transparent than the PAP.  Even that the PAP begins to lose deposit as Singapore voters look for change!

So, Chinese Johorean voters saw the political change in Singapore. And now, they are given the opportunity to join the ‘change’ movement due to the strong presence of PR, especially the DAP.

A breakthrough in Johor is important to PR.  This is their strategy to gain more seats in Johor, Sabah and Sarawak so that they can have enough parliament seats to form the federal government.

A change of government is in the making in Malaysia. We welcome the change as we believe a stronger Malaysia is good for Singapore and Singapore oppositions.
[Pakatan Rakyat offers justice, peace and equality for all. This commitment will be met by implementing our clean administrative approach together with robust implementation of our policies. We are a clean and transparent government. Our administration is based on good governance guided by moral principles and universal values. Under our administration, we shall ensure fair and effective distribution of our abundant national wealth, resulting in a marked rise in the quality and standard of living of the people.]http://pakatanrakyat.my/files/ENG-Manifesto-BOOK.pdf

Look like the luck is at PR side.

Luck is not at Najib side

Malaysian PM’s intended visit to Chinese-funded Southern University College was to get closer to the Chinese community.  However, a supposed good publicity has turned into a nightmare to BN.      
[BN supporters molested us at Najib event, claim studentsTwo 19-year-old students of Southern University College have claimed that they were sexually molested by several BN supporters during caretaker Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's function at their university yesterday.]http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/228491
DAP Lim Kit Siang is quick to ask voters to think twice about voting BN. He said if a PM cannot control his own men, how can he run the country?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...