Skip to main content

Effective SAF despite low birth rate and ageing, why not the economy?


Our economy and society are facing the same problems of lower birth rate and ageing population as the Singapore Armed Forces. However, despite same problems and challenges, as claimed by the Defence Minister, we can still maintain a strong military force in 2040.

It seems our military men and scholars are better prepared and equipped to face the challenges. And not to forget, the population by then will be 6.2 million people #1, at least half a million more than today.

Well done the SAF.

300,000 maids and 300,000 soldiers   

Should our society and economy learn from the Singapore Armed Forces? If the 300,000 men in green - active and reserve, can effectively protect Singapore even with a smaller manpower in 2040, they should have some valuable and prized experiences for the whole of Singapore.

The economy is facing the problem of shortage of manpower, skilled and unskilled. The society is facing the challenge of ageing problem and nursing care.  And there is a projection and we will need 300,000 domestic helpers in 2030.

“The National Population and Talent Division (NPTD) of the Prime Minister's Office said today that demand for foreign domestic workers or maids would increase to 300,000 by 2030 from 198,000 in 2011. “ #2

So, we will have 300,000 domestic helpers in 2030 and the same number of military men in 2040. 

How to maintain an effective army?

According to Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, his reasons to the Parliament are below:

That is, through advances in technology and with more effective systems and platforms, which require fewer men to operate.
Dr Ng said: "Beyond investing in technologically advanced platforms, we also leverage technology to network our platforms together to provide us greater synergy in training and operations. 
"So one example is the recently inaugurated community for command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence. Another important factor driving up the overall capability and productivity of the SAF lies in the rising quality of our servicemen."
"As a whole, the higher quality of our NS men combined with the advanced platforms and effective use of technology to network our systems, will ensure that the SAF continues to be an effective military force and a strong deterrent against any aggression," he added. #3
 

Technology, training, network, and better educated servicemen are the reasons given.  The armed forces draw its manpower from Singapore economy and society. In fact, only half of the population is involved as female citizens are excluded. But how come the Army can and is able to meet the challenges. But Singapore as a whole cannot do it economically and socially?  And we have to increase our manpower need year after year.

Perhaps, the SAF can give out more and more out-sourcing jobs to the civilians, especially in the logistic areas, like cooking, vehicle maintenance, etc. Perhaps, this is why the defence budget has to be so big so that they can upgrade their software and hardware as planned.    

What do you think? If we put more money into the economy (by helping businesses, SMEs and entrepreneurship development) and the society (health care and social care), will the manpower problems be solved as effectively as the  
SAF?

Assumptions of effective SAF may be wrong

An effective army has to be supported by the economy and society. The assumptions are our economy in 2040 is as solid as today and our society is as inclusive? as today. However, if we look at the 3 IPS scenarios in 2022; the then economy and society will be different from today, not to mention in 2040.

If the problems of rich-poor gap, unaffordable housing and medical expenses, low wage workers and social divide continue; will the effective army still exist? Many strongmen in Middle East and Africa claimed to have a powerful army but what are their fates now?

If more and more Singaporeans having the thinking of “NS for Singaporeans and jobs for PRs”, it is hard to imagine what the effective SAF will be?

However, in 2040, Minister Ng will not likely to be the Defence Minister.  The future Defence Minister may have to redefine the true effective army.

#1 http://populationpyramid.net/Singapore/2040/).

#2
http://www.reach.gov.sg/YourSay/DiscussionForum/tabid/101/mode/3/Default.aspx?ssFormAction=%5B%5BssBlogThread_VIEW%5D%5D&tid=%5B%5B10021%5D%5D

#3
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1236698/1/.html


Comments

  1. Shall we say, the Defence Minister was just indulging in a bit of propaganda about how effective the SAF really is? For the benefit of the new citizens so that they would stay on and the neighbouring countries, esp. up north?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...