Skip to main content

再深度的内阁讨论,也不能取代制衡

再深度的内阁讨论,也不能取代制衡

内阁内部的“深度讨论”,究竟能否代表整个社会的多元声音?

无论讨论多么深入,只要讨论仍主要发生在相同的权力结构和相近的思维框架之内,就无法完全排除集体思维的风险。尤其当社会日益复杂、政府面对的问题越来越专业化,而公众又拥有前所未有的信息和分析能力时,仅仅依靠少数决策者之间的充分讨论,可能已经不足以满足现代治理的要求。

如果再加上一个长期由单一政党主导的政治环境,以及人们对今天内阁整体素质和经验是否能够与过去相比的疑问,那么制衡、反对声音和更广泛的社会参与,就显得更加重要,而不是更加无关紧要。

进入人工智能时代。AI正在迅速降低获取知识、分析政策和提出替代方案的门槛。过去只有政府、专家和大型机构才容易拥有的分析能力,正在逐渐普及到普通公民、媒体、学者和社会组织手中。

在这样的时代,问题已经不只是“内阁有没有进行充分讨论”,而是:

我们是否正在建立一个能够把整个社会的智慧带入政策过程,并且真正制衡决策者的制度?

这才是我们今天重新思考“内阁深度讨论”这句话时,更值得关注的问题。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...