Policy option for small states: Switzerland: loss of neutrality Israel: Excess use of force And how about Singapore?

Policy option for small states:

Switzerland: loss of neutrality

Israel: Excess use of force

And how about Singapore?

Whoever wins the US Presidential Election, the USA is in decline. It is interesting to note how small nations in the world will react in a new multipolar world. So far, we have seen how Switzerland and Israel react.

When the leadership decides to make policy changes, have they considered the country’s interest or personal self interest?

Once a decision is made, the whole country will have to face the consequences, whether it is good or bad?

Soon, Singapore will hold our general election. Whether the margin is big or small, the new government will face new challenges. Challenges such as the danger of 1920s great depression.

Singaporeans must decide whether giving more votes to the PAP is a good option considering the challenges ahead. Alternatively, more opposition voices will push the government to give more care to the citizens. Besides cost of living, housing, and population problems, our foreign and defence policies will also affect our future.

How to select a good leadership that cares about the people? Do we need good leaders enjoying high salaries as well as enjoying high property appreciation?

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By inserting a single c

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog