Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from 2026

部长薪资与财富差距问题 华语俗谚中"第一桶金"之说,不妨估算部长们积累首桶金的速度?这说的可不是奥运金牌,而是真金白银啊。

  部长薪资与财富差距问题 高薪使部长们能购置更多房产。房价上涨催生更多财富,进而拉大贫富差距。 房价涨幅远超收入增速,财富不平等远大于收入不平等便不足为奇。 谁能轻松购房投资?华语俗谚中"第一桶金"之说,不妨估算部长们积累首桶金的速度?这说的可不是奥运金牌,而是真金白银啊。

The Workers' Party: Forward, backward, or status quo? The Pritam Singh question? AI makes hardworking smart people smarter but makes lazy thinkers less competitive.

  The Workers' Party: Forward, backward, or status quo? The Pritam Singh question? The evolution of WP from a single seat party to now having 12 seats in parliament shows WP is no more a regional party but a national issue.  The LO issue confirms it does matter in Singapore as well as for the PAP and WP .      Does the AI era provide opportunities to the oppositions?  How does the PAP react and maintain her super majority?  And also how WP and other alternative parties survive in a political monopoly? How WP handles the Pritam Singh question is not only the interest of WP, the PAP  but also the future of political development. The PAP has her agenda when they remove the LO.  How will WP respond and answer?  It looks like a game replay, history repeats.  But in an AI era, changes happen more often than before.  Who will benefit from the Pritam Singh question?  Will WP find a new solution, strategy to counter the simila...

幼稚?天真? 不再面对面,难道不能发问吗?

  幼稚?天真? 不再面对面,难道不能发问吗? 横眉冷对,座位移动,会影响提问吗?应该问的还是会问,需要答的,还是要答,逃避的了吗? 既然没有反对党领袖,座位是否应该悬空?由另一个行动党议员顶上,不会感觉不伦不类吗? 千夫指,指的是天真还是幼稚? 天真的认为,自导自演,没人看穿。 幼稚的行为,垄断国会,才能造出。 讽刺还是巧合?失败的政治逃兵,在国会面对面胜利者!

Money no enough! Budget after budget. Vouchers after vouchers.

  Money no enough! Budget after budget. Vouchers after vouchers. Discounts after discounts. Subsidies after subsidies. Still. Money is not enough! 

Well done! 做得好! 拒绝有理、有利、有勇气! 不提名反对党领袖,在一定程度上,有民意基础: 78%雅虎民调显示,不同意总理的做法。

  Well done! 做得好! 拒绝有理、有利、有勇气! 不提名反对党领袖,在一定程度上,有民意基础: 78%雅虎民调显示,不同意总理的做法。虽然,这只是网上的民调。不知道,咖啡店和小贩中心的反应,是否同步? 一山不容二虎。国会内一个头,国会外一个头。这似乎在搞分裂,工人党中央的声明,不但拒绝提名,也强调反对搞分裂、分权活动。 原本的1个半新加坡国会政党苗头,在这一轮操作下,连半个都没有了,回归一党独大。 选民们如果认可反对党领袖,下次大选,可要做出明确选择,不能,总要马儿跑,又不让马儿吃草!

A parliament without a Leader of the Opposition is good for Singapore, for the PAP or WP?

  A parliament without a Leader of the Opposition is good for Singapore, for the PAP or WP? Working for Singapore, for Singaporeans or for interested parties? Life is back to normal, like it or not.   It is a reality of Singapore politics.  Voters have to consider whether giving the PAP a super majority in parliament is a sure win for Singapore.   In the same lift with a white supporter who then pointed to a poster and said this is a liar and this one said the minister is stupid.  Perhaps,  the LO issue is just an enforcement, an education to make white supporters happy! 

没有反对党领袖的国会,或许, 才是真正反映新加坡政治的现实。

  没有反对党领袖的国会,或许, 才是真正反映新加坡政治的现实。 是谁羞辱了国会,自己?他人? 还是,选民?

Tiktok-style settlement for Venezuelan oil?

  Tiktok-style settlement for Venezuelan oil? Profit sharing for Tiktok USA. Deal done. Oil sharing for Venezuelan oil, direct or indirectly, happening now. Unfortunately, the new international order of sharing profits, assets, and resources is very different from the past.   You need to have some things to exchange like the monkey king and the monk.  The Journey to the West has a happy ending.  But the competition between Chinese and Americans may not end up a win-win situation, especially when one side lacks long-term strategy, commitments, and patience…

霸权的瓦解:中国平行体系如何化解美国制裁的威力

  霸权的瓦解:中国平行体系如何化解美国制裁的威力 本视频通过委内瑞拉在面对美国制裁时的韧性,深入分析了全球权力格局的深刻转变。核心观点认为,美国过去之所以能行使绝对的强制力,是因为其对全球美元金融体系的垄断;然而,随着中国建立了一套“冗余”的国际架构,这种力量正在失效。中国通过提供人民币结算机制、长期采购合同以及独立的物流体系,为受制裁国家提供了在西方体系之外生存的可能性。这种从“单极垄断”向“多极选择”的转变,意味着美国的制裁手段往往在无意中加速了替代方案的完善,标志着美国全球霸权正面临结构性的挑战。

Stupid questions in Singapore and Hong Kong.

  Stupid questions in  Singapore and Hong Kong One shows how the government works and performs. The other shows how the government thinks of others, especially our competitors. Stupid is a reminder. How some Singaporeans look at the PAP and how some foreigners look at the  government. Proud or not to be proud of.