Skip to main content

Downgrading Singapore-Taiwan Relationship by a Drunken Representative?


Taiwan is sending a drunken representative, Antonio Chiang, to Singapore. Even he is not caught by drink-driving, Chiang or any representative of the new Taiwan government to Singapore is already a clear sign of deterioration of Singapore-Taiwan relationship.

However, it may not be fair to say Taiwan under the new government is intentionally downgrading the relationship. We have to admit that Singapore is also doing the same. It is a mutual action and perhaps agreement.

It is an open secret that the People’s Action Party has close relationship with the Nationalist Party (KMT). When Chen Shui Bian of Democratic Progressive Party became the President in 2000, Taiwan-Singapore relationship has begun to deteriorate. Even Ma Ying-jeou took over the Presidency in 2008, there was no significant improvement in unofficial diplomatic relationship. (Singapore only recognises mainland China).

Military training in Taiwan is the strongest link amongst all the unofficial contacts. However, this has been downgraded as Singapore armed forces now have many training opportunities in other countries.

Chiang is a critic of the KMT government and a journalist and columnist with Apple Daily in Taiwan. Chiang, a representative of free press, now has to settle in a media controlled environment. What will be the chemical effect for him?

Here is a report from the Straits Times:

[Taiwan's new representative to Singapore Antonio Chiang has been arrested for drink driving - just hours after being sworn in for his job, the island's media reports said.
Mr Chiang, 72, was pulled over by police for a spot check in Taipei on Tuesday night. A breathalyser test showed his blood alcohol content was 0.27mg per litre.
In Taiwan, drivers caught with 0.25mg per litre or 0.05 per cent of blood alcohol content can be jailed for up to two years and fined up to NT$200,000 (S$8,500).] #

Some in Taiwan argue that 0.27mg per litre
is just a little over 0.25mg per litre and in Singapore drivers caught with 0.27mg per litre is not even an offence.


The drink driving limit seems stricter in Taiwan. Singapore is more tolerant with a higher mg per litre. But we set very high demand for press freedom. We are known as a regime unwilling to tolerate dissents and alternative views. The new Taiwan government should already know this in advance. And yet, they decide to send a newsman here, why?


Hence, we need to look at the bigger picture. In Singapore, Chiang will have to face a stricter media control. In addition to his diplomatic status (with proper protocol), he will need to observe his right of free expression in Singapore, especially our domestic politics.

Singapore and Taiwan in fact are engaging in a controlled drunken mood or misunderstanding. Taiwanese admires our economic performance and high per capita income. They also like our organised government and society. However, they always neglect the trade-off and forget the democratic development here. They also fail to see the high inequality here.

We see Taiwan people enjoying high degree of democracy, free press, sometimes even overdone.  And we wonder how can an economy progress with so many challenges, uncertainties, chaos like Taiwan. PM Lee Hsien Loong had clearly stated longer ago he could not handle more than 10 opposition MPs. So, he is not able to run countries like Taiwan?

Afterall, we certainly cannot expect a drunken envoy, who is a champion for freedom of speech, to lobby for free press here.  We know too well how the PAP treats the press as well as how they pay their respect to journalists.  Chiang, as a long time journalist, should take notice of the higher restriction on free expression. Yes, he can escape drink driving offence here but free press requirement is set higher than drink driving.

So, your excellent Mr Chiang, you can drink but be aware of free press.

http://jg69.blogspot.sg/2008/05/singapore-activists-mark-world-press.html

#

## latest development
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/taiwan-envoy-antonio-chiang-to-take-up-posting-to-singapore-after-being-spared-from

### Chiang resigned
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/taiwans-new-envoy-to-singapore-antonio-chiang-resigns-over-drink-driving-scandal

Comments

  1. I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
    Recovery

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By inserting a single c